usamamasan1 wrote:"I think young voters in this country have to vote for me if they're really thinking of what's in the best interest of the country and what's in their personal best interest," Romney said as he stood next to Rubio, R-Fla.
USA
Woot!
usamamasan1 wrote:"I think young voters in this country have to vote for me if they're really thinking of what's in the best interest of the country and what's in their personal best interest," Romney said as he stood next to Rubio, R-Fla.
USA
Woot!

peacefrompaul wrote:usamamasan1 wrote:"I think young voters in this country have to vote for me if they're really thinking of what's in the best interest of the country and what's in their personal best interest," Romney said as he stood next to Rubio, R-Fla.
USA
Woot!
Newch91 wrote:I don't want my Pell Grant cut so wealthy students who can easily afford to go to college get it.
usamamasan1 wrote:Newch91 wrote:I don't want my Pell Grant cut so wealthy students who can easily afford to go to college get it.
class warfare anyone?
Newch91 wrote:peacefrompaul wrote:usamamasan1 wrote:"I think young voters in this country have to vote for me if they're really thinking of what's in the best interest of the country and what's in their personal best interest," Romney said as he stood next to Rubio, R-Fla.
USA
Woot!
I laughed when I heard him say that, also. I like my Pell Grant. I don't want my Pell Grant cut so wealthy students who can easily afford to go to college get it.

Halifax2TheMax wrote:Good luck with Mitt Romney at the helm. How does a flip flopper govern exactly? Rhetoric doesn't provide health care, fix the budget or solve the Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security crisis, bring the troops home, find more efficient ways of producing energy, educate our young, fix our roads and infrastructure, feed our hungry or keep us safe. But Mitt will make the 1% a whole lot richer, won't he?
Halifax2TheMax wrote:Good luck with Mitt Romney at the helm. How does a flip flopper govern exactly? Rhetoric doesn't provide health care, fix the budget or solve the Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security crisis, bring the troops home, find more efficient ways of producing energy, educate our young, fix our roads and infrastructure, feed our hungry or keep us safe. But Mitt will make the 1% a whole lot richer, won't he?
Perry to Caine to Bachman to Paul to Gingrich to Santorum to Romney. Nice lineage.
Republicans: Prolife until you're born.
Peace.

usamamasan1 wrote:"Mitt Romney has earned the Republican Presidential nomination through hard-work, a strong organization, and disciplined message of restoring America after nearly four years of failed job-killing policies from President Obama and his administration," Perry said in a statement, according to ABC.

usamamasan1 wrote:Even the white house acknowledges that it Romney v Obama
Romney

peacefrompaul wrote:Halifax2TheMax wrote:Good luck with Mitt Romney at the helm. How does a flip flopper govern exactly? Rhetoric doesn't provide health care, fix the budget or solve the Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security crisis, bring the troops home, find more efficient ways of producing energy, educate our young, fix our roads and infrastructure, feed our hungry or keep us safe. But Mitt will make the 1% a whole lot richer, won't he?
Perry to Caine to Bachman to Paul to Gingrich to Santorum to Romney. Nice lineage.
Republicans: Prolife until you're born.
Peace.
The troops still aren't home so you can cross that off of everyone but Paul's list.
Halifax2TheMax wrote:peacefrompaul wrote:Halifax2TheMax wrote:Good luck with Mitt Romney at the helm. How does a flip flopper govern exactly? Rhetoric doesn't provide health care, fix the budget or solve the Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security crisis, bring the troops home, find more efficient ways of producing energy, educate our young, fix our roads and infrastructure, feed our hungry or keep us safe. But Mitt will make the 1% a whole lot richer, won't he?
Perry to Caine to Bachman to Paul to Gingrich to Santorum to Romney. Nice lineage.
Republicans: Prolife until you're born.
Peace.
The troops still aren't home so you can cross that off of everyone but Paul's list.
Sorry but I can't. Obama is the only one who will bring the troops home from Afghanistan by 2014. If re-elected, he'll do it. He's laying the groundwork now. Just can't run on it. And Ron Paul, if elected, wouldn't take office until 2013. So how does he have the monopoly on bringing them home? All out within a year of taking office? Sorry, Ron Paul isn't getting elected and it'll take everything this country has to bring them home in 2014. Why? Because at least Obama is honest. Not owned. Not a lackey. Constrained, perhaps, by circumstances and forces beyond his control but in the end, HONEST. He's working more for us than them, that I believe. As opposed to Romney who would like you to remain in fear forever. Obama has already said the "war on terrorism" is over. Nice. Its a start. Ending the perpetual war that exists everywhere, be afraid. Its your choice. So, I happen to believe that we can bring the troops home without ending the Fed, eliminating the EPA and allowing everything to be at the mercy of the markets. Government has a role in improving lives. That's why we pay taxes.
Republicans, Pro Life until you're born.
Peace.
usamamasan1 wrote:Even the white house acknowledges that it Romney v Obama
Romney
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
ICON LEGEND:
Announcement |
Sticky |
Unread posts |
No unread posts |
Locked |
Moved |
Popular