cincybearcat wrote: It's a book and you are excusing their behavior. If it was the bible in the us, you'd be signing a different tune. It is ridiculous and barbaric to call for killings over a burned book. Plain and simple, they are dangerous simpletons.

gimmesometruth27 wrote:cincybearcat wrote: It's a book and you are excusing their behavior. If it was the bible in the us, you'd be signing a different tune. It is ridiculous and barbaric to call for killings over a burned book. Plain and simple, they are dangerous simpletons.
is the bible just a book to you? personally i couldn't give a shit if someone burns a bible in america. would not bother me any. but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
i am not excusing their behavior. the bottom line is if we are stupid enough to make these mistakes then we deserve what happens to us. did they overreact in this particular situation? probably. but if you add this one on top of all of the other insults we have heaped on top of their country, their religion, and their customs, this is minor compared to what they could have done.
gimmesometruth27 wrote:cincybearcat wrote: It's a book and you are excusing their behavior. If it was the bible in the us, you'd be signing a different tune. It is ridiculous and barbaric to call for killings over a burned book. Plain and simple, they are dangerous simpletons.
is the bible just a book to you? personally i couldn't give a shit if someone burns a bible in america. would not bother me any. but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
i am not excusing their behavior. the bottom line is if we are stupid enough to make these mistakes then we deserve what happens to us. did they overreact in this particular situation? probably. but if you add this one on top of all of the other insults we have heaped on top of their country, their religion, and their customs, this is minor compared to what they could have done.
mikepegg44 wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:cincybearcat wrote: It's a book and you are excusing their behavior. If it was the bible in the us, you'd be signing a different tune. It is ridiculous and barbaric to call for killings over a burned book. Plain and simple, they are dangerous simpletons.
is the bible just a book to you? personally i couldn't give a shit if someone burns a bible in america. would not bother me any. but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
i am not excusing their behavior. the bottom line is if we are stupid enough to make these mistakes then we deserve what happens to us. did they overreact in this particular situation? probably. but if you add this one on top of all of the other insults we have heaped on top of their country, their religion, and their customs, this is minor compared to what they could have done.
not to answer for CBC but i took his comment to mean, if a bunch of christians murdered and rioted because of the burning of the bible what would you say...
Religious zealots rioting over perceived purposeful desecration of the Koran/Quran...and the sky is blue and the water is wet.
When will we learn that this is the reaction...no matter what we have to say about whether they should or shouldn't do it...this is the reaction by the crazy end of Islam.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that maybe we should simply have kept the books next to the old pants no one wears...The book is important to them, and they (the zealots not all muslims) are dangerous...you wouldn't poke a tiger and only expect it to lick you
cincybearcat wrote:mikepegg44 wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:is the bible just a book to you? personally i couldn't give a shit if someone burns a bible in america. would not bother me any. but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
i am not excusing their behavior. the bottom line is if we are stupid enough to make these mistakes then we deserve what happens to us. did they overreact in this particular situation? probably. but if you add this one on top of all of the other insults we have heaped on top of their country, their religion, and their customs, this is minor compared to what they could have done.
not to answer for CBC but i took his comment to mean, if a bunch of christians murdered and rioted because of the burning of the bible what would you say...
Religious zealots rioting over perceived purposeful desecration of the Koran/Quran...and the sky is blue and the water is wet.
When will we learn that this is the reaction...no matter what we have to say about whether they should or shouldn't do it...this is the reaction by the crazy end of Islam.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that maybe we should simply have kept the books next to the old pants no one wears...The book is important to them, and they (the zealots not all muslims) are dangerous...you wouldn't poke a tiger and only expect it to lick you
What you say is true in that we know what those religious nuts are like and we should be more careful because it only puts people's lives at risk...but the way it was handled after it happened is just as ridiculous and does make excuses for inexcusable behavior.
It is what it is. Dumb to burn 'em. Inexcusable to riot and kill people because of it.

gimmesometruth27 wrote:but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
fuck wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
how can you possibly know this? You don't appear to be a historian, and I doubt you could have possibly done all this research on your own. Additionally, how would one even judge that? What does it take, or mean to do 'good' or do 'bad'? And how would one know if it was truly in the name of that book? And, further, can one blame the book and the beliefs it espouses if an act is simply done in the name of it, and not necessarily because it advocates it?
It's easy to just say things, but do they make any sense?

gimmesometruth27 wrote:who is more barbaric or idiotic, the people described in this thread, or the people rioting over fucking nike shoes??
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/ni ... 02536.html
gimmesometruth27 wrote:fuck wrote:gimmesometruth27 wrote:but that is based on my beliefs that throughout history more bad has been done in the name of that book than good.
how can you possibly know this? You don't appear to be a historian, and I doubt you could have possibly done all this research on your own. Additionally, how would one even judge that? What does it take, or mean to do 'good' or do 'bad'? And how would one know if it was truly in the name of that book? And, further, can one blame the book and the beliefs it espouses if an act is simply done in the name of it, and not necessarily because it advocates it?
It's easy to just say things, but do they make any sense?
so the bible has not sparked wars or crusades that were waged against islam? the bible has not caused europeans to conquer the west and try to convert or kill the natives?
come on man, those are no brainers. you don't have to be a historian to name those 2 examples.
gimmesometruth27 wrote:we are talking about the military right? an institution based on respect and discipline, correct?
it is not the military's business to make mistakes. there is absolutely no excuse for this.
a simple google search could have prevented all of this.
this mistake has put soldiers' lives at risk yet AGAIN....
our military is better than that, and the world deserves better than an inept imperialistic superpower...
anymore our presence over there and the lack of empathy for the people of that country reminds me more of nero than uncle sam.
mr magoo is running things over there....
Users browsing this forum: Byrnzie and 1 guest
ICON LEGEND:
Announcement |
Sticky |
Unread posts |
No unread posts |
Locked |
Moved |
Popular